Helios 44M - Soviet era lens

So my recent episode of GAS has been all about vintage Soviet lenses. I now own five - all of which are in near mint condition and were amazingly cheap. The fascination began with me seeing posts of pics taken with the Helios 44-2 lens. It’s a 58mm f/2.0 manual focus job that was made famous in the west by Aussie cinematographer, Greig Fraser- he used it in The Batman in the car chase sequence. The lens has optical imperfections which, under certain situations, produce ‘swirly bokeh’ in the background behind the subject. The 44-2 has probably the most exaggerated form of this effect, but there were many different versions made of this lens. I own the 44-M which has less swirliness, but is possibly sharper in the center. The funnest thing about these lenses is the video they produce. I just use the ‘Natural’ preset on my Lumix S1, shoot in 4k/50p and get instantly ‘cinematic’ results. I love it. The gallery below contains images from the Bui Vien backpacker area and Binh Thanh district in Saigon, as well as a few from the night market in DaLat.

Here’s a couple of video links to show the wonderful imperfections of this lens, especially its insane flaring.


Landmark 81 tower, HCMC, VN

My Fujifilm Love Affair

About a decade ago ago, I made a dumb decision and succumbed to a near-fatal case of GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome). I dropped for a Nikon D800 that I neither needed for my general work, which was street and documentary, nor had any specific other purpose for. Along with that, I spent a s**t-ton of money on some great Nikon glass. Almost immediately I suffered buyers’ remorse. My camera backpack weighed about 8kg.

But then one day, an epiphany. I looked at my sad, under-employed face in the mirror, and said, ‘Enough already! Sell it all and downsize!’. Of course, I lost money on the resell, and hated myself even more for a while, until I picked up the first camera I ever really actually loved to use. That would be the first iteration of the the Fuji X100. I dropped from an 8kg backpack to fixed lens ‘toy’ that would nearly fit in my pocket. I also downsized from 36mp to 12mp in that move.

This little camera taught me two things. Firstly, that size matters, in the reverse way. And secondly- and this is obvious- what mattered to me was the subject of the images, and not how they were obtained, and much less their megapixel count. Of course, horses for courses here. You need a more substantial piece of kit for professional studio/commercial work, as well as the flexibility of an interchangeable lens set-up if you’re to make a living from photography as a nobody. If you don’t have an established schtick that depends on one focal length ‘look’, then you need to be versatile.

Cows being treated to watermelons, Ha Tien, Vietnam (2012) X100 1/80s @ f/2.8

Two bridesmaids at a wedding in Ha Tien Vietnam (2012) X100 1/125s @ f/4.0 + built-in fill flash.

The subject matter must be arranged in some aesthetically relevant way (composition), and that the elements must relate to each other not just spatially, but also with respect to their colour and luminance (contrast and lighting).

Shooting with an approximately 35mm fixed full-frame equivalent focal length necessitates ‘zooming with one’s feet’ - either in or out, so as to frame the shot. Looking for ways to insinuate oneself into a favourable position becomes a thing. You might even have to engage with your subjects (heaven forbid!). All this made me fall in love with wider focal length perspectives, and that constrained field of view, especially for street and documentary work.

But all this is off the track. Having dumped the heft of a dSLR kit and been introduced to a radically new, and chromatically appealing alternative (Fuji ‘color science’ is legendary), I became a Fuji fanboy. I subsequently owned the X100S, XT-1, and XT-4 cameras. My favourite of all was and still is the 16.3mp XT-1. With this camera, I shot images that featured in my first publications- firstly online on the FujilLove website, and later, in FujiLove Magazine- fantastic projects established by Tomasz Trzebiatowski.

Attention to detail. Mekong Delta, Vietnam (2013) X100s 23mm, 1/1000 @f2.0

For the first story in the magazine I wrote a naively pretentious essay about the photographic muse, using the history of Edward Weston’s bevy of young women to illustrate the point that they probably helped his career more than he’d have cared to admit. Leaving his wife to embark on a succession of affairs with women whose talent, in my opinion rivalled his own, introduced him to new places, techniques and even a world of political intrigue, embodied in the subsequent work of Tina Modotti. The story was illustrated with some of my own images about which I’ll say nothing further.

My second FujiLove publication was born out of a creative funk that led me to really not shoot much at all for a year or so. Several years prior, I’d begun shooting little out-takes of life in the tiny alleys which form the sociocultural ‘glue’ of Saigon, the largest city in Vietnam. I called this the ‘hem project’, ‘hem’ being the Vietnamese word for alley. In a lazy play on words, I called this article and photo series, ‘Hemmed-in’.

I went back into the streets and shot a bunch of new images on my recently acquired XT-4 camera (yes, submitting to the allure of new gear porn is one way to snap out of a funk- but probably the worst way). The accompanying essay was all about the people in the images, and the history of some of their locations. I would not consider any of these images to be even amongst my top 100 faves, but at least I was back in the game.

So, what is it about the Fujifilm ecosystem that photographers find so attractive? Let’s start with the obvious. Fuji create camera bodies with a pretty cool old-school look. Top plates are adorned with dials and in the XT range, the EVF is housed in an old SLR-style mirror bump.  The rangefinder look of the X100 and X-Pro series mimic the classic Leica aesthetic. Some models are two-toned, with the top section remaining its metallic sheen, and the rest being wrapped in faux leather.

Then there’s the image quality. I remember that around the time I purchased my X100, Sigma had been developing its radical Foveon sensor, which boasted incredible ‘perceived resolution’ due to it capturing red green and blue light data at every spatial location on the sensor. Normal Bayer sensors have a repeating pattern of spatially separated RGB photosites, meaning the processor engine has to make ‘best guesses’ as to the chroma values of pixels in a process called demosaicing . The Foveon sensors wound up in Sigma’s DP Merrill range of fixed lens cameras and boasted excellent image quality, but from impractical camera bodies. That fabulous IQ came at the expense of ridiculously short battery life. Worse, they could barely shoot more than a half-stop above base ISO without the image files falling to bits due to excessive chroma noise. Nonetheless, if used within their limitations, the sensors could produce images rivalling the quality of my old 36mp D800 - not bad for a 15mp APSC camera costing two thirds less than the Nikon. Some pundits even likened the DP Merrill images to those from medium format cameras. The DP1 camera is still a shopping bucket-list item for me. You can learn more about the Foveon sensor design philosophy here.

At the same time, Fuji was developing its own proprietary sensor design, the X-Trans sensor. This featured a 6x6 distribution of RGB photosites, and also boasted improved perceived resolution. Sharpness and contrast also improved due to the elimination of a low-pass filter. The first Fuji camera to feature this new 16.3mp X-Trans CMOS sensor was the X-Pro1, released in 2012. I waited until a couple of years later and got the second iteration of the sensor in the X-T1, via a short stop-over with the X100s, which also had the X-Trans II sensor.

One problem with the X-Trans cameras was (and still is at DXOMark) proprietary snobbery. Whilst Adobe Camera Raw and Lightroom had an algorithm to decode the sensor, it wasn’t great. Some of the fine details, especially in saturated greens like foliage, had a mushy appearance, which some described as ‘wormy artefacts’. Independent software developers, like Brian Griffith from Iridient Digital came to the rescue and produced demosaicing software that could extract the full potential from the Fuji sensors. However, this originally wasn’t well-integrated into traditional Adobe workflows, and meant an extra step of conversion was needed before importing into Lightroom. I believe this has since been remedied, Adobe have also been producing better demosaicing algorithms for X-Trans sensors. However, most dedicated fanboys say that Capture One is now the best all-in-one solution for processing X-Trans raw files.

Fuji ‘colour science’ is legendary.

Sure, I guess so, whatever that means. I will say this- I absolutely love the skin tones from my X-T1 and before that from the X100S (well, duh- same sensor). I think what people mostly mean when they talk about Fuji color science is the range of Fuji film simulations of their old film products. These are available in the cameras to apply directly to jpegs, and ACR, Lightroom and now Capture One also support these as colour presets which you can apply with a click to raw files after importing them.

Fujifilm make excellent lenses

All Fujifilm XF lenses are engineered from metal, unlike the plasticky offerings from Canikon and Sony. As with most lenses designed for mirrorless cameras, they employ focus-by-wire technology in which the rotation of the focus ring sends a signal to the focus motors in the lens to move the glass elements back and forth. There is no direct mechanical coupling from either the focus or aperture rings to the lens itself. That said, they all have well-dampened manual focus rings, although some of the aperture rings, notably the one on the 56mm f/1.2 (original version) can be a bit light and easy to move accidentally. Any lens with the WR suffix in its name is weather-resistant. I have been out in pissing rain with these ones and have suffered no issues with water ingress. As the aficionados like to say- Fuji lenses ‘feel good in the hand’.

My first Fujifilm lens purchase was the fantastic 56mm f/1.2 R. With a full-frame equivalent focal length of about 85mm, it was released as their first dedicated portrait lens along with the 18mm f/2.0 R, and the 60mm f/2.4 R Macro. The original 56mm has some secret sauce- a certain magic that reviewers eulogise as ‘character’. It’s sharp wide open and has a lovely dreaminess to the roll-off from the focal plane. The bokeh is creamy and specular highlights are nicely rendered, too.  However, it’s mightily prone to flaring and loss of contrast when shooting backlit subjects – so make sure to use the included lens hood in these situations (see below).

My next lens purchase was the original version of the 18mm f/2. This lens got a sound workout on my ill-fated trip to Myanmar in 2016. It was pretty much bolted to my X-T1 for the whole trip. It’s not optically brilliant wide open, nor is the AF nimble or silent. All that said, it was cheap, and is basically a pancake lens and so discreet enough not to freak out people when you want to get close. Stopping down to f/5.6-8.0 produced very fine results.

As with the 56mm lens, the 16mm f/1.4 WR is another excellent optic and boasted the added benefit of serious weather-sealing. Actually, I reckon it was probably better sealed than my camera body. This became my go-to wide angle lens and I sold the 18mm to help pay for it. I used it for street, landscape and wide-angle portraits. I can’t think of any flaws that this lens has, and it was lauded by reviewers when it arrived on the market. It just works.

Napier Pier, New Zealand (2017). XF 16mm 1.4 WR, 1/120s @ f/11

District 2, Saigon (2019) XF 16mm f/1.4 WR, 15s @ f/11

I also had a brief play with the XF 60mm f/2.4 R Macro. It’s tack-sharp straight out of the gate at f2.4 and doesn’t really get much sharper by stopping down beyond f/4.0. I couldn’t find many images taken with this lens, but the one I included here also demonstrates what I said earlier about the X-Trans II sensor. The random portrait of a great old traveler I met in Saigon shows just how sharp this lens is, and just how much you can push the pixels to even greater sharpness without them falling apart and becoming halo-y.

Street portrait, Saigon (2018) X-T1 60mm f2.4 R Macro @ f/3.6, 1/160

Finally, after I bought the X-T4, my least favourite Fuji camera, I was cash-bloated and stupidly bought my least favourite (though probably most practical) Fuji lens, the XF 16-55mm f/2.8 WR. I guess I was driven by the need to (again) lighten the load in my camera bag by replacing a bunch of prime lenses, and also to use GAS therapy to get myself motivated to get back out and start shooting again. At least it worked, and pretty much all of the images for my Hemmed-in story were shot on this lens. Don’t get me wrong- this is some very high-end glass, and every professional really needs a standard zoom in their kit- just for its versatility, but I’m just not a big fan of them. I find the wide end not wide enough for documentary and street and the long end not long enough for portraits.  

Both the X-T4 camera and the zoom lens are great pieces of kit capable of capturing stunning stills and video files alike. Truth is I just didn’t like the flippy screen on the camera. It felt cheap and plasticky to me. Plus, it drew the ire of street subjects when I flipped it out.  I rarely shoot video, and if I ever did so seriously, I’d use an external monitor anyways. I just bought the wrong thing. Looking back- the cheap and dirty old 18mm on my X-T1 would have done the Hemmed-in story just as well.

Moving on, and to this day, I have settled on the Panasonic S1 as my main workhorse. I’m not going to spruik all of its virtues here nor diss it for its foibles (yeah yeah, AF), suffice to say, that having owned and used pretty much every platform except for Canon, I find this one to be my ‘best fit’. The one thing I’ll mention is the robustness of the camera, and its genuine weather-sealing, which really is a benefit in a place where it rains for six months of the year. That said, it’s a heavy beast to carry around, and so I also own a Richo GRIII, and still have my beloved FujiFilm XT-1.

The End of the Affair?

Absolutely not. I still love using the remaining Fuji gear I have, and one day hope to inherit enough money from an as yet unidentified rich relative to be able to enter the Fujifilm GFX medium format world. Let’s see. In the meantime, I hope to do another story for FujiLove Magazine- a sort of homage to the X-T1, and its influence on me and others.

 

What do I shoot with?

I have always been susceptible to GAS (gear acquisition syndrome), meaning that I’m easily seduced by the latest developments in camera technology. It’s been an expensive, ultimately wasteful pursuit- constantly blowing more and more cash to gain incremental or just plain imagined improvements. I have shot with Nikon, Sony, Fujifilm, Pentax, Ricoh and Panasonic Lumix. The reality is they all have their strengths, and they all suffer various foibles. There is NO such thing as a perfect camera. So, with that said- here’s what I presently own-

  1. My beloved Fujifilm XT-1

  2. My pocket rocket, the Ricoh GRIII

  3. The large and in-charge Panasonic Lumix S1.

    Note that none of these cameras are particularly nimble sports and wildlife cameras- the autofocus on all of them is pretty sluggish compared to say, Canons and Sonys. There’s a range of weights and sizes here. Camera geeks will also notice that none of my cameras has a high-resolution sensor. Here’s why: only very few people need all the pixels they are buying anyways. I still think that 16mp is optimal for an APS-C sensor, and 24-27mp is plenty for a full-frame camera. I can blow these up to decent sized prints without any issues. The added advantage of a smaller pixel count is better low light performance. I do a lot of night street stuff, and having the ability, especially on the Lumix S1, to get usable images at ISO6400 is fantastic. Finally, two practical considerations- high pixel counts means massive files, which means I would need to buy extra storage, and the actual cost of high resolution versions of cameras is generally 30% or more greater. I’m presently very happy with what I’m using.

    The Ricoh is my go-to street shooter- excellent image quality from a 24mp APS-C sensor- it’s really not much bigger than a cigarette packet, and it doesn’t draw attention from people in the street.

    The Fuji only has a 16mp sensor, but the files that come out of that camera are just so nice to work with- my retoucher friend, Jose says he thinks there’s something special about working at the pixel level with files from that camera. It has some kind of secret sauce.

    The S1 is a heavy full-frame beast, and it is as strong as an ox. I can’t confidently take it out in all weather, which is good as I live in Saigon where it rains for 7-8 months/year. I especially like the evolution of the L-mount Alliance for lenses (Leica/Panasonic/Sigma), which has produced some of the best glass ever made. I have the Sigma 24-70 f2.8, which is an excellent allrounder, and the exceptional 85mm/f1.4, my go-to portrait lens. Its close to optical perfection, and for the money, kills all competitors from first-party brands. Sigma have been kicking goals with its Art series lenses, and the 85mm is no exception.

    So, that’s about it. I have a range of cameras, each of which serves a particular purpose, and none of which I’m in any hurry to replace… well, not until the next case of GAS takes hold ;)

Dalat Rendezvous No. 6

I had my first photographic show in Dalat last weekend. Mr. Quang Troc invited me to participate, also as the first Westerner to be a part of it. The art space is very special- lots of lush greenery, and all the prints were done on weatherproof corflute and displayed outside. It was a shared exhibition with five other super-talented guys with a wide range of experience and different ages. I liked all the other works, and just wished I’d had more Vietnamese language to be able to engage with the other photographers more deeply. I especially liked the works of Mr. Huynh Than Huy - a mix of vivid color and the business of recycling, and Mr. Dinh Cong Tam- the lives of Khmer Buddhist monks in Soc Trang province in the Mekong delta. I’m more attracted to photojournalistic styles, I guess. The two young guys in the show are proper art photographers, too. Very original work.

It started to rain just before the opening ceremony, which was a bit disappointing, and the crowds were definitely lower than last year due to this. Nonetheless, it was still great fun, and very grateful to Mr. Quang for the invitation to participate.

Full catalogue is here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IvZs1fG3sAMFrP1oKURnDRKHniNZH-lL/view

Ricoh GRIII Review

Review: Ricoh GR III (see here for original PetaPixel published article: https://petapixel.com/2020/11/14/ricoh-gr-iii-a-real-world-review-from-vietnam/. Whilst I am certainly guilty of becoming a fanboy of whichever new camera I own, I have never written a camera review, so this will be my first. I‘ve had my GRIII for only three weeks, so I will leave this post open and update it over time.

Introduction

Ricoh is not a brand uppermost in the minds of most photographers on the market for a new mirrorless camera. Sony, Fuji and Panasonic seem to have dominated market visibility, if not the actual market, for high-end mirrorless cameras systems for the past five or so years, with late-comers Canikon gaining traction with their most recent offerings. Ricoh is probably more famous for having acquired the Pentax brand (via Hoya) in 2011, than it is for any particular camera. But, at least in one niche, Ricoh has always been there. Before Fujifilm reinvented retro chic in its X-series digital cameras. Before old-school film cameras and vinyl record collections became the sine qua non of hipster cred, the Ricoh GR camera was there, and has been there since the first GR compact 35mm film camera hit the streets in 1996.

The GR series has a storied history, especially among street photographers, and the GR III is the latest digital iteration of the camera.

The GR III is an APS-C sensor compact camera, weighing in at a mere 257g. Out front it has a fixed 18.5 mm (28mm full-frame equivalent) f/2.8 lens with a built-in 2-stop ND filter. It features 3-axis in-body image stabilisation (IBIS), rated at four stops. Out back is a 3” 1.04 million dot rear panel, but no EVF. It has hybrid phase and contrast detect autofocus, and outputs 14 bit, 24-meganickle files in DNG RAW format, making it instantly compatible with the Adobe Photoshop suite of processing software. As with the Fujifilm system, straight out of camera (SOOC) jpegs are very appealing, owing to the built-in colour and B&W profiles- more on that later. The camera has been out for over a year now, so if you like the images here and the philosophy behind the design, but still need to know all the tech-specs, there are tons of great reviews on the interweb. I’ll provide links to the better ones below. This post will be more of a real-world account of my personal experience shooting with this little pocket rocket. If you’re not up for the full read, you can cut to THE CHASE at the end for a summary.

First impressions (only marginally more boring than watching an unboxing video).

The box and its contents are small and lightweight. Inside, there’s the camera, a truly tiny battery, USB-3 (C-type) charging cable (but no charger), tiny wrist strap, and the usual paperwork, including the nowadays redundant paper version of the operation manual. I was a bit lucky. I live in Vietnam, where Ricoh makes this camera, and a local distributor had a promotional package which was hard to resist- three extra batteries, a genuine Ricoh leather case, a silicone rubber ‘camdom’, Sandisk 32gb card, and an aftermarket charger. All for the same price as the camera alone. If you live in VN, check the link below to see if that deal is still afloat.

LP Store (Vietnam) Ricoh GR III deal

Even though I had done two months of research before deciding to drop the kablinki for the camera, I was still surprised by how small it is. However, this tiny size doesn’t get in the way of the shooting experience- quite the opposite, actually. All the controls, with the exception of the button for movie mode (no one will ever use this- explanation later), are within easy reach of my right hand and are intelligently spaced so that I don’t end up smushing two or three buttons at the same time. The front rubberised grip is shallow, but substantial enough to maintain decent security in the right hand, and most buttons are within the reach of the right thumb. I always wear a wrist strap just in case I get clumsy. Although the camera feels sturdy due to its magnesium alloy construction, it wouldn’t fare well if dropped onto a hard surface.



Nice screen, but no eyehole

The rear screen is sharp and bright enough in most situations and is touch activated- a feature which can be switched off. The touch functionality supports menu scrolling, swiping through the images for review, and can be used to select focus points. The latest firmware version (v. 1.41) allows for touch-screen activation of both focus and shutter release. In other words, you point the lens at the subject, compose the image on the screen and simply touch where you want the focus point to be and you’ve captured the image. You will never accidentally activate the touch screen with your nose when you use the electronic viewfinder (EVF) because, well, because there isn’t one. For this reason, I leave the touch functionality switched on at all times.

Battery life

In order to keep the camera small and yet still be able to accommodate the IBIS, some battery capacity was sacrificed. These DB-110 batteries are tiny- only 1100mAh. CIPA rates them at 200 shots. Good luck with that. If you chimp a lot like me, you’ll be lucky to get 150 shots per charge. They are cheap though, and KingMa make an after-market version along with a kit with two batteries and a charger. They work fine for me and I always go out with at least two fully charged batteries.

Shooting experience.

This camera is a joy to use, but you must first understand its raison d’etre, and accept its limitations.

The GR III is not a sports shooter

The autofocus and burst rate are not up to speed for that. Also, shooting sports action with a 28mm equivalent lens? Nah.

Minimum safe distancing

The old saying that long lenses are for beauty, whereas wide-angle lenses are for drama and emotion is pretty much correct. So, can the GR III do portraits? Absolutely it can, but you must be careful with the composition - the 28mm lens will distort perspective in ways that can be unflattering to your subjects. If for example, you get too close to a face, the part closest the lens- typically the nose - will look disproportionately large. This distortion can be used for dramatic effect, for example by placing a subject in the corner of the composition. Careful composition is required if distortion of the facial features or the subject’s body are to be avoided. Note that this distortion is something to consider when shooting with any wide angle lens- it’s not a flaw in the Ricoh lens, which has excellent performance specs. This thoughtful composition thing is a learning curve and part of why photography is such fun.

ISO 200 f/2.8, 1/100sec

ISO 200 f2.8, 1/320sec.

ISO 640 f/2.8 1/100sec.

Not a hybrid shooter.

Most YouTube reviewers quite rightly don’t bother discussing the (lack of) video capability of the GR III. The video specs top out at 60 frames/sec, 1080p. The moving images are quite soft, and the continuous autofocus is just ok. I haven’t even tried shooting video with it, as my Samsung S10e is a better video solution.

So what is this camera for? Who is it for?

In keeping with the heritage, the digital age GR cameras are essentially marketed by Ricoh as being street shooters. This is essentially true, but it sells the camera short. A better description would include something more about its great versatility.

Environmental portraits

This camera is capable of beautiful environmental portraits, in which some context is included within the frame around the subject. For me as a story-teller, this means it’s a fantastic documentary camera. Within the 28mm frame, I can make grammatically complete visual ‘sentences’ with each image containing a subject, verb and object. In the past, the photojournalist’s go-to focal length was generally 35mm. Modern photojournalism embraces a wider field of view, typically provided by a 24mm focal length, as this is the wide end of most professional standard zooms on the market. The GR III’s 28mm FOV is an excellent sweet spot in between 24mm and 35mm.

ISO 250 f/3.5, 1/160sec.

ISO 500 f2.8/, 1/160sec.

ISO 500 f2.8/, 1/160sec.

(Sidebar: composing on the rear panel)

Here’s an interesting perspective on rear panel verses viewfinder composing from a friend and semi-retired pro photographer, Robert Morehead. Robert told me that since switching out all his pro dSLR gear for point and shoot cameras a few years ago, he has found himself paying closer attention to the composition on the rear panel and little to no time in cropping his images in post. I have found this to be true for my own work, also. I usually crop to a 5 x 7 frame in Lightroom, but with the GR III, I generally find myself just leaving the image dimensions as shot. Interesting observation.

Built environment and landscape

The GR III is also great for architectural photography, with the caveat being that if you want to fill the frame with a complete building or other structure, you might need to zoom out by using your feet. This is not always possible, of course. Lately I have been taking pics of the beautiful old French colonial villas in my adopted city, Da Lat in Vietnam. These old gems are usually situated in the middle of large blocks of land, so this isn’t much of an issue. I can usually frame the villa and surrounding gardens from the sidewalk.

ISO 100 f/5.0, 1/320sec.

ISO 100 f/8, 1/80sec

ISO 200, f/6.3, 1/400sec B&W cross-process preset in LRCC

ISO 500 f/2.8, 1/100sec.

The GR III can also capture landscapes, and 28mm is well suited to this task. NiSi makes a set of filters for the GR III for people who like to use slow shutter speeds in order to blur waterfalls and flowing rivers. I haven’t tried them yet, but they are receiving good reviews. Links here:

Nisi Master Series filters for Ricoh GR III: B&H

How to use Nisi filters

Mini macro monster.

I was surprised and delighted to discover that the GR is a brilliant little macro shooter. While out taking pics of the local French villas one day, I discovered a colourful orb-weaver spider waiting in ambush in the centre of its web. I switched into macro mode and snapped away at different apertures to try and capture its fine details.

ISO 200 f/5, 1/400sec

ISO 200 f/5, 1/400sec. 100% crop from a different image to above.

Once I had settled on f/5.0 in order to get most of the critter in focus, the results were excellent. I used the touch-screen autofocus method for this. You compose the image, then touch the screen where you want to focus, half-press the shutter to acquire this point, then push all the way. It worked well, but if you have the luxury of being able to use a tripod in the field, you could also try the manual focus setting. There is focus assist peaking and also a magnification setting which lets you focus with more precision. Focus is then acquired by using the scroll wheel on the back of the camera. It’s slow, requiring many turns to pull focus, but it’s accurate.

One nifty feature of manual focus is that it can be instantly overriden by using the screen-touch method mentioned above. No need to switch out of manual mode to do this. I had a play with manually focusing in macro mode at home, and really didn’t see much difference in accuracy compared to using the autofocus method.

Food focus

I have been doing a little food photography for a client lately, and whilst I haven’t used the GR professionally for this yet, I can see its potential in this regard. In macro mode, you can get close enough to the subject food item to create a dreamy out-of-focus background and draw the eye of the viewer to the culinary creation on the plate.

ISO 400 f/4.5, 1/160sec.

ISO 1000 f/4, 1/50sec

IBIS

The GR III is the first in the GR series to sport 3-axis in-body image stabilisation. This is rated by Ricoh at 4-stops. In practice, i’ve found I can get sharp images of stationary objects at shutter speeds down to about 1/8sec. If I limit my intake of strong Vietnamese coffee, I can achieve sharpness whilst hand-holding at 1/4 sec. Quite impressive for a tiny point and shoot.

f8 and be there

The design ethos of the Ricoh GR III centres on its fitness for street photography. There are several features that make this so.

Snap focus is principal amongst them. Snap focus allows you to pre-set a focusing distance to which the camera automatically ‘snaps’ at a full shutter button press. It can also be set up to work at the touch of the rear screen. This means the camera will not waste time acquiring focus in the normal way. It will immediately jump to the focal distance you set - 1m, 1.5m, 2m, 2.5m, 5m or infinity. It is essentially zone-focusing by another name. If you choose, say 1.5m and f8, the instant you squeeze the shutter, everything from about 1m to 5m will be in acceptably sharp focus. Here’s the caveat, though- this is only true for moving subjects if you have chosen a fast enough minimum shutter speed to freeze their motion. Typically for people doing stuff on the street, 1/200sec is enough for this. For faster moving subjects like vehicles, experiment with faster shutter speeds, or follow the subject and shoot as you pan.

Ninja stealth

The understated minimalist design of the camera doesn’t attract attention. Its diminutive form factor, black body and near silent leaf shutter mean you will more likely be seen as a gormless tourist who’s strayed from the beaten path, rather than as a serious photographer.

One-handedness

The camera is easily operated on the street with just the right hand. If you’ve set up the snap focusing distance and an aperture to allow for a deep enough focal plane, you can shoot with one hand and drink a beer with the other - local laws permitting. There’s a depth of field scale on the left side of the screen which shows you the approximate range of acceptably sharp focus.

Image Quality

This is a summary of my findings after a short time with the GRIII. For a deeper dive into this aspect, have a look at DP Review here.

This camera is capable of producing gorgeous, highly detailed images. The 24mp sensor allows for some cropping latitude, and there is also a 35mm in-camera crop setting, which gives you a 35mm field of view at the expense of a third of the megapixels in the file.

The lens and sensor are perfectly matched (a bit like the Fujifilm X100 series with its 23mm f/2.0 lens, and the Leica Q with its 28mm f/1.7). This means there are no compromises regarding sharpness. The lens is easily capable of resolving the full 24mp of the sensor. Wide open at f/2.8 images are centre sharp but a little soft in the corners, as is normal for most lenses, but stopping down to just f/4 gives edge to edge sharpness. Nice!

In low light, the camera performs about on par with its competition. That is to say, at ISOs up to about 1600, files are not noticeably noisy, but by 3200, the noise begins to impact on the fine details. My maximum auto ISO is set to 6400, although in most situations I’d prefer to be shooting at 3200 or lower. Of course, all this depends a lot on your end purpose, too. High ISO noise is more visible on larger screens and in large prints.

ISO 2500 f/3.5, 1/15sec

ISO 2500 f/3.5, 1/25sec

In any case, the images that come from this camera will likely be subjected to post-processing with settings which add noise, or at least some grainy ‘character’ to the images. The very nature of the subject material this camera was designed to shoot invites the use of ‘grungy’ or old-school film presets in editing. I’m a big fan of using these myself because some of them just look so good. That’s not to say the RAW files don’t look great with the default settings of Adobe Colour and conservative sharpening when they open up in Lightroom. It’s rather that high contrast, high structure black and whites simply ‘look right’ for the street. To see what I mean, check out the work of famous Japanese street shooter, Daido Moriyama.

(Sidebar: Wabi-sabi)

Wabi-sabi is a Japanese aesthetic which celebrates the beauty found in imperfection. Daido Moriyama’s images exemplify this aesthetic. His subjects are rarely in sharp focus, the images are so contrasty that skies are blown out to white and shadows are crushed into blackened oblivion. All of which should amount to an epic photographic fail. But not so. His pictures are compelling, challenging, full of drama and intrigue.

For a great overview of the philosophy of wabi-sabi, take a look at Jamie Windsor’s YouTube episode on his favourite photographer, Nan Goldin.

Even without applying presets the images out of this camera have a certain ‘look’ to them. They seem ‘gritty’ to me, even at the base ISO of 100, and I really dig this look. I have heard pundits guessing the reason for this being the pixel pitch, the baked-in sharpening of the DNG files, or something else. I’m not a tech geek, so I’ll leave it to engineering types to work out. Suffice to say, the GR images seem to have an edginess to them that actually compliments the street or documentary vibe of scenes shot with the camera.

For those who want to exploit the GR legend fully, there’s an in-camera jpeg ‘Image Control’ setting called ‘Positive Film’ - it’s slightly old school, with strongish contrast and desaturated colours. Greens tend more toward blue, reds are a bit magenta-ish. This preset even has its own Flickr page as a mark of the reverence that fanboys have for it. Adobe LR and Adobe RAW don’t yet offer any of the Ricoh presets. This is a shame, because the B&W ones are also excellent. But fear not, there is an inexpensive work around.

Samuel Lintaro Hopf, YouTuber and Ricoh GR aficionado has produced a set of GR Positive Film emulation presets for Adobe Lightroom and Camera Raw. His package also includes some excellent versions of Fujifilm’s beloved Acros black and white film. They can be purchased here.

Whilst I’m giving him free plugs, Samuel's YouTube Channel is an excellent resource for GR fanboys and girls.

In summary, I am really enjoying the images from this camera, as well as the whole experience of using it. It’s portability, paired with stellar image quality and versatility have made it my new everyday carry. I love it!

THE CHASE

What’s great

Discreet design - perfect for not attracting the ire of people you are shooting

Silence is golden- you can shoot people at a sombre indoor event without being ticked off for noisy shutter sounds.

It’s tiny- this camera won’t be left at home because it’s too big to carry out and about- it fits in your hoodie pocket.

Image quality- the 24mp sensor and lens together are capable of taking incredibly crisp and detailed images.

Ricoh’s Positive Film jpeg preset, and the B&W preset options- the Positive Film preset has almost as big a cult following as the camera itself. Old school-ish, without looking like a cheap Instagram filter.

Macro- a great bonus feature of the camera is its ability to get close and capture details of flowers, critters, products or food. Yay!

Haptics- despite it being so small, the GR’s control layout is easily navigable with ‘normal’ sized hands. It’s designed for one-handed operation on the street.

Snap focus- this is a great feature for street, or for any situation where you need to respond quickly to a changing scene. This feature also partly negates the first item on the ‘What sucks’ list.

3-axis IBIS- excellent for hand-holding to shoot static subjects in low light.

Three customisable user modes- Although I have set two of them up, I find that the quick menu is so easy to use, that I don’t bother unlocking the mode dial to change mode settings in real-world situations.

Finally, It’s just such great fun to shoot with! I have never owned a camera before that just makes me want to take pictures as much as the GR III.

What sucks (a bit)

Autofocus- compared to much of its competition, and considering that the latest GR has phase-detect as well as contrast detect focusing, it is not the snappiest camera to lock on to subjects. This is especially true in the case of low light and/or when using the macro feature, when it can hunt for focus quite a bit. Also I found that using ‘Pinpoint Focus’ hunts more in low light than either ‘Auto Focus or ‘Select Autofocus’. ‘Select AF’ is my go-to setting.

Low light, high ISO performance- It’s not a full frame Sony, so don’t expect clean images into the ISO stratosphere. I find the GR high ISO performance on par with my Fujifilm X-T4.. Don’t forget there are flash options (see below), and also the IBIS, which can reduce the required shutter speed, and allow you to shoot at lower ISO values.

Price- It’s not cheap, especially considering its limited video specs.

Unremarkable video- Meh. There are other options for this- the best of them are from Fujifilm, Sony and Panasonic They won’t fit in your pocket, though.

Battery life- so buy some extras, Cheap Charlie!

No weather sealing- I live in a place where it rains for five months of the year, so this does suck.

THE BOTTOM LINE

If you shoot street, documentary, or just want a genuinely pocketable travel camera with excellent image quality, and if you can afford the admission price, just buy one!

Extra stuff

Here are some links to things of interest around the GR III:

Ricoh hosts a GR community webpage featuring many ‘GRists’ - well-known users of the GR series:

Ricoh GRist blogsite

Most standard speedlight systems are unwieldy on the tiny GR III. Here are two that have been well-reviewed and play well with the form factor and portability:

(manual only): Lightpix Labs Q20 II flash

(TTL metering): Pentax AF201FG flashgun

Most YouTube photography channels focus on gear reviews. This is great and provides useful information for prospective buyers of new equipment, but here are two guys whose focus is more on the philosophy of taking photographs. I have found both to be informative and inspiring.

Jamie Windsor

Sean Tucker

Dalat industry

Da Lat, in the central highlands of Vietnam is famous for its central lake, the silly Valley of Love and Crazy House attractions, as well as for its fresh air and cool mountain weather. Having lived here now for a month, it has also become apparent that DaLat is far from being a natural wonderland. The main industry is horticulture, and DaLat is Vietnam’s non-tropical flower growing capital. As a result, nearly every valley in the ranges surrounding the city has been denuded of its natural vegetation and encapsulated in a shroud of greenhouse plastic. Setting aside the obvious eyesore that this represents, it also means that the night sky is completely obliterated by the sodium orange horticultural lamps which illuminate the atmosphere and accelerate the growth of the flowers. This is disappointing for anyone wanting to enjoy a clear starry sky, but it’s not the only environmental vandalism prevalent in Dalat. Developers have also been busy destroying the built environment. One local told me that around 2,000 of the original French colonial houses which once adorned the European style avenues have been demolished within the past 10 years. Presumably this is to make way for more architectural crimes such as shitty 4- and 5-star hotels.

All that said, there are still some treasures to be found here. and one doesn’t need to head out too far from downtown before encountering the transition to more natural scenery. I’ll keep posting here on the city and its surrounds over coming weeks. I hope to one day do a complete photographic survey of the remaining colonial buildings, too. There is a curated Facebook page which is an excellent resource for anyone wanting to learn more about the old French buildings- Here’s the link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/DalatDLO/

Ok, so maybe I was a little harsh in those early posts. Here’s what I think now- yes, all of what I said still applies, but the benefits of living in that otherwise beautiful part of the world far outweigh the problems I see in the town. I loved living there and will definitely return to stay sometime in the future. probably not in Dalat, per se, but certainly within Lam Dong province.

IMG_0393.jpeg

Hipstamatic shots from Dalat

Recently, I updated my iPhone (only to an old 6s, but quite a leap forward from my iPhone 4). I’m having great fun reconnecting with the joy that is hipstamatic. This city is known for its natural beauty, but sadly, a lot of it has been consumed by greenhouse agriculture. Nearly all of the valleys in and around the city have been cleared of vegetation to make way for plastic greenhouses, which at night are lit by sodium-coloured lamps in order to force the year-round flowering of the yellow Chysanthemum morifolium - the ubiquitous floral tribute offered on the ancestor altars of Vietnamese houses. Anyone hoping for a glimpse of the stars at night will be disappointed too, as a result of the orange glow polluting the night sky.

There are plenty of beautiful spots remaining though, but one must travel out of town a ways to see them. I will be updating this post - and adding more posts- as I get to explore the city in more detail over the coming months. These Hipstamatic images are taken in and around Da Lat, and capture something of the mood of this lovely part of the world.

Da Lat graffiti

Da Lat Graffiti - we stumbled across a lakeside housing development which had gone tits-up in the gorgeous city of Da Lat. I'm still waiting to hear more about the details, but clearly someone bit off more than they could chew, and there are perhaps as many as 40 large villas all at the same stage of incompletion. Local and maybe some Saigon artists have festooned these joints in fine style.

gun-toting tot

WARNING! Residents of Phu Nhuan District, Saigon are advised to stay behind locked doors until further notice. Seen earlier this evening terrorizing small businesses on Phan Xich Long St., this 2-year old gun-toting tot patrolled the street, demanding free fruit smoothies and a nappy change. Shit-scared pedestrians described her as "unhinged", "cute", "adorable" and "a bit stinky". Local SWAT teams are en route as I post. Take care out there!

Burmese Bus trip from Hell.

Ok, so here's the bus trip from hell. We started off in Bagan and got a minibus to Magway in Burma's central west en route to Sittwe on the Bay of Bengal. That was four hours of discomfort, but nothing compared to what followed.

In Magway, Western tourists are a rare species and the locals reacted accordingly- laughing at us, trying to be helpful, touting for our business, etc. We had to wait there for a further three hours before our 'luxury sleeper bus' arrived, also presumably from Magway. So we ate curries and drank the marvelous local stout (8.1%) called Black Shield.

Then the shit started.

We'd no sooner gotten on the bus and started moving when the driver suddenly stopped and he and a small group of other blokes crawled underneath it and emerged with some kind of sealed, cylindrical engine part. They then dissected it and replaced the O-ring on the disc of a large plunger. By the look of the part, and the red auto-transmission fluid which drained from it, I guessed either it was the power-steering or the brake booster unit. It was concerning, but I wasn't freaking out... not yet.

By the time they'd got it back together and re-installed, we were running three hours late.

About an hour and a half up the road, this time at a remote restaurant/beer station in the dead of night, we stopped again. Again the driver and his crew removed the same part and proceeded to operate. My mate, Paul and I couldn't sleep for anxiety and frustration, so we watched the repair this time, and drank cups of the crappy '3-in-one' coffee powder mixed with lukewarm water. Another two hours elapsed before the booster unit was reinstalled.

Then one of the 'mechanics' proceeded to wrap himself around the rear wheels and bark instructions at the driver to activate and release the brakes. So now we knew. We’d definitely had a problem with the braking system- they were bleeding the brakes- in the dark. Great.

The driver then did a quick series of brake tests, backward and forward, jamming the brakes on and throwing the passengers around inside. If they weren't awake, they sure were now.

Finally, at about 2.30am, we were back on the road. Paul and I couldn't sleep for fear for our lives. And, with good reason. Within 30 minutes we were crossing a mountain range that divides central Burma from its west coast. The single-lane road was treacherous; steep climbs were followed by precipitous drops into mulitiple hair-pin bends. At numerous points, the road was either still under construction or under repair. Evidence of landslides from the previous wet season was abundant. Two vehicles couldn't pass, so one had to give way to the other, or back up out of the way. It took six hours to emerge from the tallest ridges onto a relatively gentler series of foothills, and a further five hours to descend to the flatlands on the other side of the range. I remember then thinking that the bus driver must be totally fucking exhausted.

Aside from a mildly amusing war being waged between Paul and the boxes of goods badly stacked up at the rear of the bus which kept falling on his head, we thought we'd survived the worst of it. I lapsed into a light sleep. Then suddenly the unmistakeable sound of a road accident and the bus halted abruptly. I was fully awake now. people were yelling and standing up, a little panic ensued as passengers realized that the front door had been stoved in by the impact, and the only egress was through the side windows.

We threw our luggage out first to locals who had quickly gathered at the site, then clumsily alighted on the ground, six feet below.

Only then did it it become clear what had happened. We had collided with another bus coming from the opposite direction, and then had veered to the right, slamming into the corner of a bridge guardrail. Had it not been there, we would have then plunged five meters into a trickling creek.

Local villagers swarmed the scene and helped everyone disembark from both buses. Miraculously, there were no injuries- on either bus. I started taking photos and thought originally the other bus was at fault. But then I saw the skid marks from the other bus. There were none from ours. It appears as though our bus driver had either A: fallen asleep at the wheel, or B: had hit the brakes, which then failed, possibly due to the original fault which he'd tried to fix for a total of five hours.

The pictures in the documentary and street section tell the story, anyways.

The drama hadn't quite finished yet. The buses weren't going anywhere, and had blocked the road. The cops eventually arrived and forbade anyone from leaving the 'crime scene'. We had to present our passports before we were allowed to make arrangemnets to continue our journey. We had thoughts of staying the night in the village. Eventually, we were released and hired a 3-wheeled tuk-tuk to Mrauk U, the site of an ancient city and the next nearest town. Mrauk U was 40km down the road, but about 20 minutes into the journey, we passed another accident. Two villagers on a motorbike had collided with another tuk-tuk. Both were face down on the roadside, the man was motionless, unconscious or perhaps dead, the woman with her longyi hoiked up over her waist, exposing her bare backside was at least breathing. I wanted to cover her up- there was no dignity here.

We sped past, and I felt guilt at not demanding that the driver stop and let us render assistance. There were others already at the scene, and what could I do anyways. Haaaiiizz. It made me reflect on the trivial nature of existence, the cheapness of life, and all of that. Haaaizzz.

We got into Mrauk U at dusk and did the usual running around looking for a suitable guesthouse. We found a primitive $10/night affair, but it could have been The Park Hyatt. It felt so good to be horizontal, alive, and asleep.

The next day we took a private riverboat from Mrauk U to Sittwe, where we discovered that we had risked our lives to visit a nondescript backwater, with nothing to commend it as a tourist destination. But it was the most relaxed we'd felt on the whole journey.

lockdown_Q3

The first lockdown in Saigon was well subscribed, with most locals ‘doing the right thing’ which to this day has resulted in a disproportionately low number of infections and deaths for this city. Vietnam in general has been a model nation on how to do it right. For this I feel oddly patriotic (I have lived here 10 years), and uncharacteristically proud of the people here. There are a few exceptions, though…

untitled-4.jpg

A man gives his son a haircut on the lawn beside the canal. As in the west, hairdressers were forced to shut shop during the recent lockdown due to Covid-19. Scenes like this were not uncommon. 

untitled.jpg

A woman exercises on the canal near my house, defying all the tape designed to warn people off the equipment. 

A lottery ticket seller snoozes beside the canal on Hoang Sa St. in District3, HCMC. Like many disabled people in this city, he derives his livelihood from the sale of the tickets. During the lockdown, lottery sales were banned- hence the empty clip…

A lottery ticket seller snoozes beside the canal on Hoang Sa St. in District3, HCMC. Like many disabled people in this city, he derives his livelihood from the sale of the tickets. During the lockdown, lottery sales were banned- hence the empty clipboard. God only knows how these people got by. Whilst there are a few charities which cater to the needs of those with disabilities, there really is no specific program set up for them as exists in the global north. My son has cerebral palsy, and thankfully lives in Australia, where such work programs are government funded and his needs are well-met. I often wonder what his life would have been like had he been born here.